View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006394 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2021-01-21 13:29 | 2021-03-02 15:13 |
| Reporter | Liam Power | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Summary | 0006394: Explicitly state UA SC security token handling requirements | ||||
| Description | Nowhere in the spec. does it state that the security token lifetime, renewal etc. can be ignored or handled differently for a channel with SecurityPolicyNone. Nonetheless we have had an IOP issue with a client that does not renew the security token for SecurityPolicyNone. The net result is that the token eventually times out and the server closes the channel. Can we clarify in the spec that the security token lifetime must be managed for all security policies including SecurityPolicyNone. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
|
|
OpenSecureChannel::Response::revisedLifetime Updated in |
|
|
Agreed to changes in Virtual F2F. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-21 13:29 | Liam Power | New Issue | |
| 2021-03-01 15:34 | Matthias Damm | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
| 2021-03-01 15:34 | Matthias Damm | Status | new => resolved |
| 2021-03-01 15:34 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2021-03-01 15:34 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0013842 | |
| 2021-03-02 15:13 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2021-03-02 15:13 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05 |
| 2021-03-02 15:13 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0013885 |